Evidence - Only Person Holding Privilege Can Assert It

D'Amico v. Structural Co., 631 Az. Adv. Rep. 11 (App. Div. I, April 4, 2012) (J. Johnsen)

The Mc Leod's were getting ready to retire and saw a counselor for personal matters as well as advice as to how to transition their company at retirement. The counselor recommended they hire a "transitional" chief executive officer to assist the process. They hired the plaintiff. However, this didn't work out primarily due to disputes over compensation so the Mc Leod's company, Structural, fired her. She sued for breach of contract and bad faith. It is significant that she only sued Structural and not the Mc Leods. Structural counterclaimed for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. The jury awarded damages to plaintiff and the defendant with a net result of judgment in the amount of $910,616 to plaintiff. Both parties appealed. The defendant's principal argument was that the trial court improperly admitted testimony concerning personal counseling from their counselor. The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed.

It is hornbook law that only the person who holds a privilege may assert it. Here, because the Mc Leods and not Structural held the privilege only they could assert it so the evidence was properly admitted. The court did not address whether testimony by a counselor as opposed to a licensed psychologist fit within the privilege established in ARS sec. 32-2085.

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

Initial consultations are completely complimentary and we only get paid when you get paid. As such, we always have your case and your best interest in mind, because it’s in our firm’s best interest to do so.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.