Tardy Filing of Cost Bond Does Not Destroy Superior Court Jurisdiction of Appeal from Mandatory Arbitration

Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., __ Ariz. Adv. Rep.__ , 1 CA-CV 090202 (App., Div. I, February 25, 2010) (J. Kessler)


Plaintiff wife sustained a slip and fall injury in defendant store. Wife was awarded $3,000 in mandatory arbitration but plaintiff husband received nothing on his loss of consortium claim. Husband and wife appealed but failed to timely post a cost bond. Trial court denied defendant's motion to strike the appeal for the tardy filing. Trial court later issued judgment against the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs then appealed claiming their appeal to superior court should have been dismissed for failing to timely file the cost bond.

The Court of Appeals held the late filing of a cost bond in support of an appeal from mandatory arbitration does not destroy jurisdiction in the Superior Court to hear the appeal because the Superior Court has discretion to extend the time for filing of the bond. ARS sec. 12-133 (H) and Rule 6 (b) Ariz. Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. In so holding the court expressly overruled Varga v. Heburn, 116 Ariz. 539, 570 P.2d 226 (App. 1977).

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.