Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Arizona Supreme Court Approves Rewriting of Rules of Civil Procedure

Posted by Dev Sethi | Sep 08, 2016 | 0 Comments

As part of its annual review of proposed changes to court rules, the Arizona Supreme Court has approved a comprehensive restyling of, and other amendments to, the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. These rules govern civil cases filed in the superior courts throughout Arizona.  .

The amendments reflect the most comprehensive revision of Arizona's civil rules in nearly fifty years. They are based on recommendations made by the Task Force on the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, which Chief Justice Scott Bales established at the end of 2014 with the charge of identifying possible changes that would help clarify and simplify the rules.

Dev Sethi served as a member of the 17-person committee, which included lawyers, judges, and court personnel from throughout Arizona and different practice backgrounds. Working thousands of hours over two years, the Committee submitted its final recommendations to the Arizona Supreme Court this past summer.

Chief Justice Bales praised the Task Force's work, noting, “Arizona's court rules should be as clear and concise as possible for the benefit of litigants, lawyers, and judges. Rewriting the rules to achieve these goals is tremendously difficult, and the Task Force members did an extraordinary job that will improve justice across our state.”

The restyling chiefly aims at rewriting the rules to make them easier to use and understand. The amendments, however, also make some substantive changes, including:

• Generally requiring service of process within 90 days after the filing of a complaint to
prompt the timely progress of cases (Rule 4)
• Updating Arizona's rules regarding class actions (Rule 23)
• Following the model of recent amendments to federal rules regarding the scope and
limits of discovery, including the requirement that discovery be proportional to the
needs of the case (Rules 16 and 26.1)
• Adopting new rules regarding the preservation, disclosure, and discovery of
electronically stored information or “ESI” (Rules 26.1, 37(g), and 45)
• Requiring parties to specify whether they are withholding documents under an
objection (Rule 34)

The rule amendments will generally become effective on January 1, 2017, and will apply to
cases filed after that date and, except to the extent a court orders otherwise, pending cases.

For more information about the courts in Arizona, please visit  You can click the link below to read the full set of new rules.

About the Author

Dev Sethi

Dev Sethi litigates and tries a wide-range of complex injury and death cases throughout Arizona. He has Martindale Hubbell's highest rating, AV, and he is listed in "Best Lawyers." Dev is also recognized as an Arizona Super Lawyer in the area of plaintiff's products liability litigation.Dev has been at the forefront of auto product defect litigation. He played a key role in uncovering the Goodyear Load Range E tire scandal and worked to hold Ford Motor Company responsible for the danger posed by their now notorious 15-passenger vans. Dev is currently representing families in product liability suits against the nation's largest corporations including General Motors, Ford, Pentair Pools and Invacare.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.