Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Can Sean Miller or the University of Arizona Sue the Media for Defamation?

Posted by Matt Schmidt | Mar 01, 2018 | 0 Comments

The college basketball scene here in Tucson has been a little chaotic. Unless you have been hanging out in your basement all week, you are now aware that ESPN recently reported having knowledge of an alleged FBI wiretap recording of a phone conversation  between University of Arizona head coach Sean Miller and an agent that involved paying a player to play for the Wildcats. While some of the media has called for coach Miller's head, others have seriously questioned the factual accuracy of the report, noting critically that the person who made the report, Mark Schlabach, does not appear to have even had access to or listened to the alleged wiretap. Coach Miller has vehemently denied any accusation that he has been involved in any foul play.

Now that the report is being cast into serious doubt, many wonder whether Sean Miller and/or the University can succeed in a defamation lawsuit against  the media outlets and reporters that published such serious accusations without much confirmation at all regarding their accuracy. To answer this question, let's review the elements a plaintiff must prove to succeed in defamation claim:

The defamatory statement must be communicated or published to a third party.

Let alone the entire country. This has clearly occurred.

The defamatory statement was made negligently or with actual malice.

If coach Miller was an everyday, regular citizen, he would simply have to prove the statement was made negligently, or unreasonably in light of the circumstances. Because he is a public figure, however, the standard is higher. Public figures have to prove that the reporter made the statement either knowing it was false or with reckless disregard for the truth. 

A good case can be made that this report was made with reckless disregard for the truth or the consequences it might have on others. A nationally known entity with a gargantuan reader/listener base like ESPN should know better than to report something accusing someone of a federal crime purely through hearsay and without having any access to the actual source that would confirm the accusation. 

The defamatory statement has caused the plaintiff harm or damages.

Sean Miller's livelihood is on the line and the University's reputation has been challenged. Future recruits have de-committed. This element can clearly be checked off.

The defamatory statement must be false.

Obviously, the coach and the University cannot sue a media outlet for reporting the truth. If a lawsuit were to occur, it is likely the alleged wiretap would be made available to the parties for review.  If the wiretap either doesn't exist or reveals a conversation much different than what has been alleged, ESPN and other media outlets might be in a bit of trouble. If coach Miller or the University does file a lawsuit, it probably indicates they are confident of this outcome.

About the Author

Matt Schmidt

Matt graduated from the James E Rogers College of Law at the University of Arizona in passing the Arizona bar exam in 2010. Matt's primary interest in law focuses on general personal injury and insurance bad faith.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.