Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Compulsory Arbitration Awards: Validity of Untimely Arbitration Award

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Sep 20, 2023 | 0 Comments

North Shore Condominium Ass'n v. Wan-Tsing Kwang, No. 1 CA-CV 22-0641 (App. Div. I, September 14, 2023) (J. Campbell) https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2023/CV%2022-0641%20North%20Shore%20OP.pdf
ARBITRATION AWARD ADDING FEES AND COSTS TO AMOUNT AWARDED IN “NOTICE OF DECISION”  IS VOID IF FILED LATER THAN 50 DAYS FROM DATE OF “NOTICE OF DECISION”/”NOTICE OF DECISION” CONVERTS INTO “ARBITRATION AWARD” AFTER 50 DAYS BY OPERATION OF LAW DIVESTING ARBITRATOR OF JURISDICTION

Plaintiff brought a claim for unpaid assessments against defendant and in Compulsory Arbitration received an Arbitrator's “Notice of Decision” in the amount of  $6,942.50 in assessments and $1,645 in attorneys' fees on December 15, 2021.  Plaintiff was directed by arbitrator to apply for recoverable costs. On December 20, 2021 plaintiff submitted a proposed award asking for costs and an additional $16,885 in litigation related fees. Arbitrator did not act until March 22, 2022.  Defendant objected arguing the Arbitration Award which included additional fees was untimely. The trial court entered judgment for the plaintiff including costs and a reduced fee award of $8,000 in litigation fees. The Arizona Court of Appeals vacated and remanded.

Ariz. R. Civ. P. 75 requires an arbitrator in a compulsory arbitration matter to issue a “Notice of Decision” stating how she decides the case. Parties submit forms of award and objections, but the Arbitrator is to issue a formal “Arbitration Award” within 50 days of the “Notice of Decision.” Finally, the failure to file the formal “Arbitration Award” within 50 days turns the “Notice of Decision” turns the “Notice of Decision” into the “Arbitration Award.” Once the 50 days runs and the Notice of Decision becomes the Arbitration Award as a matter of law, the Arbitrator is divested of any jurisdiction to issue any further decisions or awards.

About the Author

Ted A. Schmidt

Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation".

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.