Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Constitution—Crime Victim Right to Be Heard re Restitution

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Sep 20, 2021 | 0 Comments

Constitution—Crime Victim Right to Be Heard re Restitution

State v. Fox, No. CR-20-036-PR  (September 20, 2021) (J. Bolick)


Defendant shot and killed a man in his home and was convicted of second degree murder. The mother of the murder victim sought $570,159.45 in restitution as a crime victim under the Victim's Bill of Rights. See Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 2.1(C). In a Joint Report Regarding Remaining Restitution Issues the parties agreed to $558, 117.45 in restitution but the court awarded $562,980.45.

Eight months later the defendant filed a Petition for Post-Conviction Relief based primarily upon the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, but asked for an expedited ruling on his petition to delay the appeal of the restitution order—the Limited Petition. Mom files a Response to the Limited Petition and defendant moves to strike the response essentially claiming she lacked standing. The trial court agreed resulting in Mom bringing this Special Action.

The Arizona Court of Appeals  accepted jurisdiction but denied relief. The Arizona Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction and reversed the superior court while vacating and remanding the court of appeals decision.

The supreme court held: “In this case, we hold that a crime victim has a constitutional and statutory right to be heard on the merits of a defendant's motion for a delayed appeal of a restitution order.”

“The Victim's Bill of Rights is an intended baseline, not a ceiling.”

“The  determination of whether [defendant] may proceed with a delayed appeal of the restitution order will directly impact [the victim's} rights to due process, prompt restitution, and finality. The latter two are substantive rights. Should [Defendant] prevail in his effort to present a delayed appeal, it will  have the inevitable effect of delaying restitution and postponing finality. But for the pending motion, the issue of restitution would be settled. The victim's right to due process attaches to those substantive rights.”

CLICK HERE to read the full case.

About the Author

Ted A. Schmidt

Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation".


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.