Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Contracts: Homeowner Association Enforceability of Amendment Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Oct 21, 2024 | 0 Comments

Gross v. The Shores at Rainbow Lake Comm. Ass'n, No. 1 CA-CV 23-0394 (App. Div. I, October 10, 2024) (J. Thumma)

AMENDMENT TO CC&R's OF HOA ONLY ENFORCEABLE IF “REASONABLE AND FORESEEABLE”

Defendant The Shores Lake Community Association [HOA] amended its Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions [CCR's] to “prohibit: (1) leases lasting less than 30 days and (2) more than four unrelated individuals leasing property in the community.” Plaintiffs, homeowners engaged in short-term rental within the HOA, sued to have these amendments invalidated. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted the plaintiffs summary judgment as to amendment 1 and granted the defendant summary judgment as to 2. The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed.

Kalway v. Calabria Ranch HOA, LLC, 252 Ariz. 532, 537 ¶ 10 (2022) is the controlling case establishing a CC&R amendment is a valid and enforceable contract provision, provided it is reasonable and foreseeable.  The CC&Rs here make no mention of a set term or time period limitation on homes put out to rent. The 30-day amendment creates an “entirely new and different restriction on the Owner's use of their property in a manner that was unforeseeable.”  It is unenforceable.  The second amendment, however, is reasonable and foreseeable in light of the fact the CC&Rs already limits use of property to “Single Family Residential use.”  Adding the restriction that no more than 4 people in the house can be unrelated simply further clarifies the meaning of “Single Family.”

About the Author

Ted A. Schmidt

Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation".

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.