Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Insurance: Underinsured Motorist Coverage Statute A.R.S. § 20-259.01(B) & Financial Responsibility Act A.R.S. § 28-4135(A) Read Together Do Not Require UIM Coverage for Off-Road ATV Accident

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Jun 02, 2025 | 0 Comments

State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Orlando, No. CV-23-0228-PR (May 29, 2025) (J. Montgomery) https://opinions.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2025/CV230228PR.pdf

A.R.S. § 20-259.01(B) DOES NOT REQUIRE UIM COVERAGE APPLY TO OFF-ROAD ACCIDENT INVOLVING ATV

 Defendant suffered a serious leg injury while riding as a passenger off the public streets on an All-Terrain vehicle [ATV]. The driver of the ATV's insurer paid defendant its policy limits. She then made this claim against her underinsured motorist insurance [UIM] with plaintiff State Farm Automobile Insurance Company [State Farm]. State Farm denied the claim based upon the following policy language: “Underinsured Motor Vehicle does not include a land motor vehicle: . . . . 2. designed for use primarily off public roads except while on public roads[.]”

 This declaratory relief action/counter-claim for breach of contract and bad faith action followed. The trial court granted State Farm's motion for summary judgment finding the ATV operated off road here was not a covered vehicle under the policy. Defendant appealed and the Arizona Court of Appeals reversed finding A.R.S. § 20-259.01(B) requires UIM carriers cover off-road accidents since the UIM statute does not expressly allow for such an exclusion. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the trial court and vacated the court of appeals decision.

 The supreme court finds the Financial Responsibility Act, A.R.S. § 28-4135(A), which requires all auto insurers in Arizona provide minimal liability limits” to be in pari materia (of the same subject matter) as the UIM statute A.R.S. § 20-259.01(B). So while the UIM statute does not define “motor vehicle” the FRA does and its appropriate to apply that definition to UIM coverage.  The FRA defines motor vehicle, “‘[m]otor vehicle' means a self-propelled vehicle that is registered or required to be registered under the laws of this state.” A.R.S. § 28-4001(3). And under the FRA, “[a] motor vehicle that is operated on a highway in this state” must be sufficiently insured. § 28-4135(A). the insurance requirement “does not apply to the owner or operator of any: All-terrain vehicle or off-road recreational motor vehicle operating on a dirt road that is located in an unincorporated area of this state.” § 28-4132(9).””

 Applying the FRA definition of motor vehicle, we hold

that UIM coverage of an off-road ATV accident is neither required

nor prohibited under the UMA. UIM coverage in such a

circumstance is a matter of contract. Therefore, the Policy's

definition of “underinsured motor vehicle,” resulting in preclusion

of UIM coverage, is permissible under Arizona law.

About the Author

Ted A. Schmidt

Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation".

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.