Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Nonclaim Statute Time Limits on Claims Against Estate

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Jun 29, 2016 | 0 Comments

Ader v. Estate of Felger, __Ariz. Adv. Rep. ___ No. 2 CA-CV 2015-0170 (App. Div. II, May 27, 2016) (J. Vasquez)


Plaintiff invested in numerous commercial real estate ventures with Dan Felger. Felger died. Plaintiff sued his estate more than two years after Felger's death alleging numerous claims, such as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent concealment, negligent misrepresentation, conversion, and racketeering. All were based upon acts of Felger before his death and brought more than two years after his death. Defendant sought summary judgment based on ARS §14-3803(A). Plaintiff asked for more time to do discovery before the court ruled on the motion under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 56(f)(1)(A). Plaintiff claimed the deadline to file her claims should accrue on the date she discovered the claim not the date of death and that any deadline should be tolled until a personal representative is appointed for the estate which had yet to occur. The trial court denied the motion for more time and granted summary judgment. The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed.

Plaintiff was not entitled to more time to do discovery before responding to the motion for summary judgment because the issue raised in the motion was purely a question of law. No amount of discovery would change that or the basis for applying the statute.  It was uncontroverted that all the acts forming the basis for plaintiff's claims occurred more than two years before this action was brought.

ARS §14-3803(A) places a two year from the date of death on claims existing before death and the statute accrues upon death regardless of the date plaintiff discovered the claims.  The court held:

However,§14-3803 is a nonclaim statute. A nonclaim statute is “‘[a] law that sets a time limit for creditors to bring claims against a decedent's estate. Unlike a statute of limitations, a nonclaim   statute is usu[ally] not subject to tolling and is not waivable. . . . Claims against an estate that arose before the decedent's death must be presented within the time limits of §14-3803(A). Because such claims    cannot be presented until a personal representative has been appointed for the estate, § 14-3104, the onus is on creditors to initiate  probate   proceedings   when   none   are forthcoming, see §14-3203(A)(7).  Otherwise, if a personal representative is not appointed within two years of the decedent's death,  most  claims  cannot  be  presented  against  the  estate. §14-3108(4).  And, despite the fact that a personal representative has not been  appointed,§14-3803(A) bars most claims when  brought  more than two years after the decedent's death. See §14-3108(4).

About the Author

Ted A. Schmidt

Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation".


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.