Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Restitution: Future Lost Wages

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Nov 13, 2025 | 0 Comments

E.H. v. Slayton, 568 P3d 377 (April 30, 2025) (C.J. Timmer) https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supreme-court/2025/cr-24-0245-pr.html

FUTURE LOST WAGES OF MURDERED CHILD ARE RECOVERABLE AS RESTITUTION TO EXTENT THE AMOUNT HAS A REASONABLE BASIS AND IS NOT PRODUCT OF SPECULATION OR CONJECTURE

Defendant Lillian Hester was convicted of murdering her six-year-old nephew, Jack, and her boyfriend and Jack's grandmother plead guilty to charges of child abuse and endangerment. Jack's half-sister, Elise, seeks $3 million in future lost wages in restitution  from defendants. Elise has a right under the Victims' Bill of Rights (Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 2.1(A)(8)) to restitution. The trial court rejected the claim finding a murdered child's future lost wages constitute consequential damages which are not recoverable as restitution See A.R.S.  § 13-603(C). The Arizona Court of Appeals agreed and affirmed. The Arizona Supreme Court reversed and remanded with instructions to the Coconino County Superior Court and vacated the Arizona Court of Appeals decision.

The Arizona Constitution defines “victim” as “the person's spouse, parent, child or other lawful representative, unless that individual is incarcerated or is the accused.”  Restitution reimburses the “economic loss” suffered by the victim. See § 13-603(C) “Economic loss”  means  “losses that would not  have  been incurred but  for  the  offense,”  including  “lost  earnings”  but  excepting  “damages  for  pain  and  suffering,  punitive  damages  [and]  consequential  damages.”    § 13-105(16) restitution is  paid  to the  victim's  immediate  family.    Importantly, the victim may bring a civil lawsuit to recover other damages,  including  claims for  pain  and  suffering,  consequential  damages, and punitive damages.”  

Future lost wages of a murdered child constitute an economic loss which qualified surviving family members may recover as restitution provided the amount sought can be proven to have a reasonable basis and is not the product of speculation or conjecture

About the Author

Ted A. Schmidt

Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation".

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.