Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Torts: Standard of Care of Operator of Emergency Vehicle

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Oct 25, 2022 | 0 Comments

Torts: Standard of Care of Operator of Emergency Vehicle

Jennings v. Agne, No. 1 CA-SA 22-0090 (App. Div. I, October 20, 2022) (J.Perkins)


City of Mesa Police Officer Jennings entered an intersection on a red light with lights and sirens to clear the intersection for herself and other emergency vehicles on an emergency call for back up of an officer with a gun drawn on an armed suspect.  Plaintiff collided with Jennings's vehicle. Plaintiff sued alleging negligence. Defendants moved for summary judgment claiming that the standard of care was either recklessness or gross negligence and not simple negligence. The Arizona Court of Appeals accepted special action jurisdiction of the trial court's denial of the motion and granted the defendants the relief requested.

Arizona statutes give operators of emergency vehicles the right to “disregard laws governing the direction of movement or turning” so long as the operator is responding to an emergency and has lights and sirens on. A.R.S. § 28-624. These statutes control and require proof of a driver's reckless disregard for safety to maintain an action for tort damages arising out of a collision with an emergency vehicle so long as the driver used an emergency “bell, siren or exhaust whistle” and at least on emergency light.

Further, while driving is ordinarily a ministerial task not protected by qualified immunity, driving in response to an emergency police call for backup is not and is protected. “The public simply cannot afford for those individuals charged with securing and preserving community safety to have their judgment shaded out of fear of subsequent lawsuits.”  

About the Author

Ted A. Schmidt

Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation".


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.