Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian Blog

Torts/Governmental Liability—County Sheriff and Not County Vicariously Liable for Negligence of Deputy Conducting Enforcement Duties/Notice of Claim

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Jul 23, 2025 | 0 Comments

Sanchez v. Maricopa County, No. CV-24-0013-PR (July 21, 2025) (J. Montgomery) https://opinions.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2025/CV240013PR.pdf COUNTY HAS NO CONTROL OVER DEPUTY SHERIFF AND IS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR DEPUTY CONDUCTING LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO REARENDS PLAINTIFF/COUN...

Continue Reading

Wills: Signature Requirement for Holographic Wills

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Jul 18, 2025 | 0 Comments

In Re Estate of Bixby, No. 2 CA-CV 2024-0366 (App. Div. II, July 11, 2025) (J. O'Neil) https://www.appeals2.az.gov/decisions/CV20240366Opinion.pdf “XO” AT THE END OF AN ALLEGED TESTAMENTARY NOTE DOES NOT MEET THE HOLIGRAPHIC WILL SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT Decedent left behind two sticky notes befor...

Continue Reading

Insurance: Underinsured Motorist Coverage Statute A.R.S. § 20-259.01(B) & Financial Responsibility Act A.R.S. § 28-4135(A) Read Together Do Not Require UIM Coverage for Off-Road ATV Accident

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Jun 02, 2025 | 0 Comments

State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Orlando, No. CV-23-0228-PR (May 29, 2025) (J. Montgomery) https://opinions.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2025/CV230228PR.pdf A.R.S. § 20-259.01(B) DOES NOT REQUIRE UIM COVERAGE APPLY TO OFF-ROAD ACCIDENT INVOLVING ATV  Defendant suffered a serious leg...

Continue Reading

Evidence: Clergy—Penitent Privilege

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | May 13, 2025 | 0 Comments

Rodriguez-Ramirez v. State, No. 1 CA-SA 230182 (App. Div. I, April 29, 2025) (J. Gass) https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2025/Rodriguez-Ramirez%20Final.pdf A.R.S. § 13-4062.3  PRECLUDES ADMISSION OF A CONFESSION MADE BY A PRIEST TO A CO-PRIEST ACTING IN A PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY...

Continue Reading

Understanding Arizona's Comparative Fault Rule

Posted by Dev Sethi | Jan 22, 2025 | 0 Comments

When you're injured in an accident in Arizona, determining who is at fault is a critical part of securing fair compensation. Arizona follows a "comparative fault rule," which can significantly impact the outcome of your personal injury claim. Understanding how this rule works is essential to prot...

Continue Reading

CHALLENGES OF THE ER MALPRACTICE CASE

Posted by Peter Akmajian | Jan 15, 2025 | 0 Comments

Many of the potential cases we consider relate to care in the Emergency Room.  These are challenging cases in part because the Arizona legislature imposed a requirement that such cases be proven by “clear and convincing” evidence, and at least one Arizona court has added to the difficulties surro...

Continue Reading

Fundamental & Prejudicial Error in Jury Deliberations

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Dec 12, 2024 | 0 Comments

State v. Mekeel, No. 1 CA-CR 23-0102 (App. Div. I, December 5, 2024) (J. Brown) https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2024/Mekeel%20-%201%20CA-CR%2023-0102%20-%20Opinion.pdf PROVIDING JURY WITH EXHIBIT NOT ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE CONSTITUTED FUNDAMENTAL ERROR BUT WHERE JURY GAVE LI...

Continue Reading

THE CRISIS IN PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE

Posted by Peter Akmajian | Nov 12, 2024 | 0 Comments

A recent study by the American Medical Association exposes a disturbing public health crisis—more than 80% of emergency departments (ERs) in the U.S. are not fully prepared for pediatric cases.   This is despite the fact that pediatric ER visits make up about 20% of total ER visits each year.   T...

Continue Reading

Torts: Accrual of Abuse of Process Action and Waiver

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Oct 28, 2024 | 0 Comments

Liberti v. City of Scottsdale, No. 2 CA-CV 2024-0082 (App. Div. II, October 25, 2024) (J. Sklar) https://www.appeals2.az.gov/decisions/CV20240082releasedasOpinion.pdf ABUSE OF PROCESS CLAIM ACCRUES AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY WHEN PLAINTIFF “REALIZES” OR “RESONABLY SHOULD KNOW” SHE HAS BEEN DAMAGED RE...

Continue Reading

Rules of Civil Procedure: Default Judgment Appropriate Where No Timely Answer to Amended Complaint Filed/Right to Appeal form Default Judgment

Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Sep 11, 2024 | 0 Comments

Melbye v. Dennis, No. 2 CA-CV 2023-0209 (App. Div. II, September 9, 2024) (J. Eckerstrom) https://www.appeals2.az.gov/decisions/CV20230209Opinion.pdf FAILURE TO TIMELY ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT IN FACE OF ENTRY OF DEFAULT SUPPORTS ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT/DEFENDANT MAY APPEAL FROM DEFAULT JUDGME...

Continue Reading

  • 3 of 38

Our team works together - for you!

Our award-winning lawyers are backed by a talented, caring team of legal professionals, paralegals, bilingual assistants, notaries, and others - all dedicated to you, your case, and the compensation you deserve.

No fees and no costs until we win.

As such we always have your case and your best interest in mind. When you win, we win too by providing the best legal care possible.

Thorough investigation and preparation.

We tirelessly and thoughtfully prepare every case we represent as though it was going to trial. This lets insurance companies know that we are a force to be reckoned with. As such, we settle successfully 98% of the time.